Brain activation differences between muscle actions for strength and fatigue: A brief review.

  • Cassio V Ruas Physical Education School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - cassio_ruas@hotmail.com
  • Camila D Lima Physical Education School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
  • Ronei S Pinto Physical Education School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
  • Marcio A Oliveira University of Maryland, Information & Technology, College Park
  • João A. C. Barros California State University, Fullerton, Department of Kinesiology, Fullerton
  • Lee E Brown California State University, Fullerton, Department of Kinesiology, Fullerton
Keywords: brain, activation, muscle action, strength, fatigue

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brain activation differences for strength and fatigue have recently been investigated due to advancements in brain-imaging methods.AIM: To review brain activation differences between concentric, eccentric and isometric muscle actions for strength and fatigue.METHODS: 12 studies were selected by accessing PubMed and Web of Knowledge databases.RESULTS: Collectively, the literature demonstrates that for strength the parietal and frontal lobes of the cortex that control movement preparation, planning and execution, and process feedback information are more activated during eccentric than concentric actions. In the supplementary motor area, event-related desynchronization is continued for both concentric and eccentric actions, but only present at the beginning and end of isometric actions. This indicates the CNS specifically controls each of these muscle actions. For fatigue, cortical activation is greater in the supplementary and premotor areas during isometric actions, but may be greater primarily in the central, occipital and parietal cortical areas for concentric and eccentric actions.INTERPRETATION:Muscular strength can be elicited with eccentric actions to more effectively activate control and memory of movement in the parietal and frontal lobes. Muscular fatigue can be elicited with isometric actions to selectively activate supplementary and premotor areas, or with concentric and eccentric actions for central, occipital and parietal cortical areas.

References

Abeln V, Harig A, Knicker A, Vogt T, Schneider S. Brain-imaging during an isometric leg extension task at graded intensities. Front Physiol 2013; 4.

Bailey SP, Hall EE, Folger SE, Miller PC. Changes in EEG during graded exercise on a recumbent cycle ergometer. J Sports Sci Med 2008; 7: 505-11.

Berchicci M, Menotti F, Macaluso A, Di Russo F. The neurophysiology of central and peripheral fatigue during sub-maximal lower limb isometric contractions. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 135.

Dal Maso F, Longcamp M, Amarantini D. Training-related decrease in antagonist muscles activation is associated with increased motor cortex activation: evidence of central mechanisms for control of antagonist muscles. Exp Brain Res 2012; 220: 287-95.

Dunn-Lewis C, Flanagan SD, Comstock BA, Maresh CM, Volek JS, Denegar CR, et al. Recovery patterns in electroencephalographic global field power during maximal isometric force production. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25: 2818-27.

Fang Y, Siemionow V, Sahgal V, Xiong F, Yue GH. Greater movement-related cortical potential during human eccentric versus concentric muscle contractions. J Neurophysiol 2001; 86: 1764-72.

Fang Y, Siemionow V, Sahgal V, Xiong F, Yue GH. Distinct brain activation patterns for human maximal voluntary eccentric and concentric muscle actions. Brain Res 2004; 1023: 200-12.

Gwin JT, Ferris DP. An EEG-based study of discrete isometric and isotonic human lower limb muscle contractions. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012; 9: 1.

Kubitz KA, Mott AA. EEG power spectral densities during and after cycle ergometer exercise. Res Q Exerc Sport 1996; 67: 91-6.

Mechau D, Mücke S, Liesen H, Weiß M. Effect of increasing running velocity on electroencephalogram in a field test. Eur J Appl Physiol 1998; 78: 340-5.

Taylor JL, Butler JE, Allen GM, Gandevia SC. Changes in motor cortical excitability during human muscle fatigue. J Physiol 1996; 490: 519-28.

Ushiyama J, Takahashi Y, Ushiba J. Muscle dependency of corticomuscular coherence in upper and lower limb muscles and training-related alterations in ballet dancers and weightlifters. J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 1086-95.

Kraemer WJ, Vingren JL. Muscle Anatomy. In: Brown LE, editor. Strength training. 1st ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 2007. p. 3-28.

Brown LE, Weir JP. ASEP Procedures Recommendation I: Accurate Assessment Of Muscular Strength And Power. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online 2001; 4: 1-21.

Gibson H, Edwards RHT. Muscular exercise and fatigue. Sports Med 1985; 2: 120-32.

Thorstensson A, Karlsson J. Fatiguability and fibre composition of human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 1976; 98: 318-22.

Enoka RM. Eccentric contractions require unique activation strategies by the nervous system. J Appl Physio 1996; 81: 2339-46.

Kuhtzâ€Buschbeck JP, Ehrsson HH, Forssberg H. Human brain activity in the control of fine static precision grip forces: an fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience 2001; 14: 382-90.

Safri NM, Murayama N, Igasaki T, Hayashida Y. Effects of visual stimulation on cortico-spinal coherence during isometric hand contraction in humans. Int J Psychophysiol 2006; 61: 288-93.

Foltys H, Meister IG, Weidemann J, Sparing R, Thron A, Willmes K, et al. Power grip disinhibits the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex: a TMS and fMRI study. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 332-40.

Chen R, Yung D, Li J-Y. Organization of ipsilateral excitatory and inhibitory pathways in the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 2003; 89: 1256-64.

Chakarov V, Naranjo JR, Schulte-Mönting J, Omlor W, Huethe F, Kristeva R. Beta-range EEG-EMG coherence with isometric compensation for increasing modulated low-level forces. J Neurophysiol 2009; 102: 1115-20.

Andrykiewicz A, Patino L, Naranjo JR, Witte M, Hepp-Reymond M-C, Kristeva R. Corticomuscular synchronization with small and large dynamic force output. BMC Neurosci 2007; 8: 101.

Kuruganti U, Murphy T, Pardy T. Bilateral deficit phenomenon and the role of antagonist muscle activity during maximal isometric knee extensions in young, athletic men. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 1533-9.

Published
2016-07-16
Section
Systematic review articles