BJMB
Brazilian Journal of Motor Behavior
Special Issue:
COVID-19 (coronavirus disease): Impacts on motor behavior
!
Leite, Barela, Barela
2021
VOL.15
N.1
26 of 33
Playful activity remained constant while electronics use increased in children during
social distancing amidst the COVID-19 outbreak: A Poá’s pilot study
MARLON M.V. LEITE
1
| ANA M. F. BARELA
1
| JOSÉ A. BARELA
2
1
Institute of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, Cruzeiro do Sul University, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
2
Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, SP, Brazil.
Correspondence to:!José A. Barela. Av. 24-A, 1515, Bela Vista, Rio Claro, SP, 13506-900
email: jose.barela@unesp.br
https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v15i1.238
HIGHLIGHTS
Time spent using electronic devices was
increased during the pandemic period.
Children from Poá city maintain their play
time while social distancing.
Pandemic restrictions did not impact total
sleeping time in children from Poá city.
ABBREVIATIONS
ANOVA Analyses of variance
COVID-19 Coronavirus disease
MANOVA Multivariate analyses of variance
SARS-Cov-2 Severe acute respiratory
syndrome
SPSS Statistical Package for Social
Sciences software
PUBLICATION DATA
Received 19 01 2021
Accepted 25 02 2021
Published 01 03 2021
BACKGROUND: The disease caused by the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has produced one of the most
dramatic health crises, impacting humans’ daily lives worldwide. Social distancing and lockdown measures have
limited everyone’s daily activities and have likely also affected children’s physical activity.
AIM: To investigate physical activity and electronics use during COVID-19 social distancing in children from the
city of Poá, São Paulo.
METHOD: Data from 28 children (10 males, 18 females) were obtained on two occasions: pre-pandemic
(October 2019) and during the pandemic (May 2020). To further examine possible changes in physical activity,
data from another sample of 40 children (20 males, 20 females) were obtained during the pandemic (May 2020).
From both cohorts, anthropometric information and play, television, electronics, and sleep time expenditures
were obtained using a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Results from the first cohort (28 children) showed similar time spent engaged in playful activities and
sleeping before and during the pandemic. Although hours spent watching television remained constant, a
dramatic increase in the overall electronics time expenditure was observed (from 3.4 to 5.8 hours/day) during
the pandemic period. A comparison of the results for the two cohorts confirmed these findings: there were no
between-group differences in the data obtained during the pandemic period.
CONCLUSION: Although the children maintained their play time while social distancing, an increase in the time
spent using electronic devices was observed, possibly due to the characteristics of the social distancing
implemented in Brazil, as well as the characteristics of the children’s neighborhood.
KEYWORDS: Pandemic | Physical activity | Social distancing | Motor behavior
INTRODUCTION
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2), which causes an
infection termed as coronavirus disease (COVID-19), might lead to acute respiratory
distress syndrome and several other health issues, and in extreme cases, can lead to
death.
1
Presently, there are over 120 million global cases, and there have been more than
2.6 million deaths.
2
Due to the lack of pharmacological resources to combat COVID-19, several
protective behaviors have been recommended and adopted worldwide, such as avoiding
physical contact, including handshakes, hugs, and kisses, and banning large social
gatherings and events. More dramatic measures like self-isolation, social/physical
distancing, home confinement, and quarantine have also been implemented and enforced.
Such dramatic and unprecedented measures, at least in contemporary society, have
altered the daily living activities of most of the world’s population.
3
Moreover, following the
necessary COVID-19 procedures may lead reduced physical activity and increased
sedentary behavior,
4
since measures such as isolation, social distancing, confinement, and
BJMB! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Special Issue:
!!!!!! Brazilian!Journal!of!Motor!Behavior! !!!!!!!!!!!!COVID-19 (coronavirus disease): Impacts on motor behavior
!
Leite, Barela, Barela
2021
VOL.15
N.1
27 of 33
quarantine restrict most people’s freedom to engage in physical activities.
Lack of physical activity is just one of several health risks associated with
lockdown and/or social distancing measures. Staying at home in observance of the
COVID-19 pandemic measures has led people to increase the time they spend seated in
front of screens, as lockdown has prompted a massive surge in teleworking,
5
which, in turn,
has increased sedentary behavior. In addition, although most people are expected to
suffer some type of mental disorder amidst the pandemic, the lack of physical activity and
the increase in sedentary behavior may lead to a significant portion of the population
experiencing minor emotional adjustments.
6
For instance, sleep time has increased in both
adults
4
and children,
7,8
and children’s sleep quality has worsened.
7
Therefore, social
distancing measures might not only impact physical activity, but also a person’s behavior
and health as a whole.
Despite all the changes that have been imposed due to the quarantine, little is
known about the impact of social distancing measures on children’s behavior. Children’s
daily activities have been severely impacted due to school closure. Instead of going to
school and interacting with their peers, children must stay at home due to the lockdown,
likely with little opportunity to engage in outdoor activities and interactions. A recent study
showed a significant reduction in physical activity and an increase in sedentary behavior in
Spanish children during a lockdown period.
9
Similar results were observed even for very
young children (3-year-olds) in Chile, who exhibited dramatic behavioral changes.
7
Reduced physical activity in children and adolescents has several consequences.
First, physical activity in the early years of life is critical to promote active habits in
subsequent years,
10
which is associated with health benefits. Moreover, the activities that
are typically promoted in the school environment are critical to increase children and
adolescents’ participation in active play.
11
Thus, social distancing and, more drastically,
months-long lockdowns might not only affect physical participation at present, but also in
the future. Therefore, it is necessary to further examine the effects of social distancing
measures on children’s physical activity. Thus, this study aimed to investigate physical
activity and electronics use during COVID-19 social distancing among children from the
city of Poá, São Paulo, Brazil.
METHODS
Participants
Two cohorts of children participated in this study. First, 28 children (16 girls, 12
boys) were evaluated on two occasions: before and during the implementation of COVID-
19 social distancing measures. On the first occasion, children were evaluated in October of
2019 (before the social distancing measures), and on the second occasion, the same
children were evaluated in May of 2020 (after about two months of the implementation of
social distancing measures).
Given the relatively small sample size, the second cohort, consisting of 40 children
(24 girls and 16 boys), was also evaluated in May of 2020 (after about two months of social
distancing measures). Data from this cohort were compared to the data obtained during
social distancing (i.e., from the 28 children in the first cohort). Age and anthropometric
information for both groups, taken at each evaluation time point, is depicted in Table 1.
The study participants were enrolled in the Poá, São Paulo public school system
BJMB! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Special Issue:
!!!!!! Brazilian!Journal!of!Motor!Behavior! !!!!!!!!!!!!COVID-19 (coronavirus disease): Impacts on motor behavior
!
Leite, Barela, Barela
2021
VOL.15
N.1
28 of 33
and come from a low middle class social background. Initial contact with the children’s
parents (October 2019) occurred at the children’s schools. Parents were informed about
the study’s purpose and procedures, and they signed a consent form. Contact while social
distancing measures were in place occurred via phone calls/text messages. Again, parents
were informed about the procedures, and they signed a consent form. Therefore, all
procedures were performed with the adequate understanding and written consent of the
persons legally responsible for the participating children. Furthermore, the study was
conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board.
Procedures
Before the implementation of social distancing, the study participants’ parents
were contacted at their children’s school. They completed the questionnaire (see below) in
a designated room. The children’s anthropometric information (body mass and height) was
obtained at this time. While social distancing measures were in place, the same
questionnaire was digitally sent to and returned by the parents, using media that was
available to them. Parents were also asked to report their child’s body mass and height (as
measured independently).
This study utilized the SAÚDES-Vitória questionnaire, which is composed of 17
questions; five address the commute between home and school, three address leisure
physical activities, and six address sedentary activities. Prior to its use in this study, the
questionnaire was tested,
12
validated,
13
and employed in a study involving children of the
same age as the present study’s participants.
14
At any time, parents could either physically or virtually contact the researchers to
clarify questionnaire items. Due to its simplicity, the SAÚDES-Vitória questionnaire only
takes a few minutes to complete, and parents reported no difficulty.
Data Reduction
Based on the responses to the SAÚDE-Vitória questionnaire, the total time that
each child spent engaged in physical activity per week was obtained. Regarding sedentary
activity, the number of hours per day that each child spent watching television was also
obtained, along with the number of hours spent with electronic use. Finally, each child’s
sleeping time (hours/night) was also computed.
Each child’s body mass index was calculated based on the anthropometric
information, i.e., body mass and height, obtained via direct measurement or as reported by
the participants’ parents.
Statistical analysis
Table 1 Means (standard deviations) of chronological age, body mass, height and body mass index of each group at the
moment of evaluation.
Characteristics
Group 1
(n=28)
Group 2
(n=40)
Before
During
During
Age (yrs.)
9.1 (1.0)
10.0 (1.0)
9.6 (1.9)
Body mass (kg)
36.5 (9.7)
39.3 (10.4)
37.0 (15.9)
Height (m)
1.36 (0.11)
1.41 (0.14)
1.36 (0.15)
Body mass index (kg/m
2
)
19.4 (3.5)
19.3 (2.7)
19.3 (4.5)
BJMB! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Special Issue:
!!!!!! Brazilian!Journal!of!Motor!Behavior! !!!!!!!!!!!!COVID-19 (coronavirus disease): Impacts on motor behavior
!
Leite, Barela, Barela
2021
VOL.15
N.1
29 of 33
After accepting the normality and homogeneity of variance assumptions, two sets
of tests were performed. The first set of analyses involved two multivariate analyses of
variance (MANOVA) and two analyses of variance (ANOVA), with evaluation (before and
during social distancing) as a factor, treated as a repeated measure. The first MANOVA
had body mass, height, and body mass index as dependent variables, and the second had
hours spent watching television and hours spent playing electronic games. The dependent
variable in the first ANOVA was total time spent engaged in physical activity. In the second
ANOVA, hours spent sleeping was the dependent variable.
The second set of analyses involved MANOVAs and three analyses of variance
ANOVAs, with group as a factor (Group 1: n = 28; Group 2: n = 40). As dependent
variables, the first MANOVA had body mass, height, and body mass index, and the second
had hours spent watching television and playing electronic games. The first ANOVA had
chronological age as the dependent variable, while the second and third had total time
spent engaged in physical activity and hours spent sleeping, respectively.
When necessary, follow-up univariate analyses were performed. All the
procedures were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software
(SPSS), and an alpha level of 0.05 was adopted.
RESULTS
Table 2 depicts the hours the children in each group spent engaged in the various
activities at each evaluation point.
Comparison between before and during social distancing
MANOVA revealed an evaluation effect (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.661, F
(3,25)
= 4.27, p <
0.05) for the anthropometric variables. Univariate analyses showed that the children’s body
mass (F
(1,27)
= 8.11, p < 0.01) and height (F
(1,27)
= 11.81, p < 0.005) increased, but there
was no change in body mass index (F
(1,27)
= 0.02, p > 0.05), as shown in Table 2.
ANOVA did not reveal an evaluation effect for physical activity (F(
1,27)
= 0.16, p >
0.05). Similarly, ANOVA did not reveal an evaluation effect for time spent sleeping (F
(1,27)
=
1.55, p > 0.05). However, MANOVA revealed an evaluation effect (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.062,
F
(2,26)
= 198.08, p < 0.001) for sedentary activity. Univariate analysis showed that while
there was no difference between evaluations for television (F
(1,27)
= 0.29, p > 0.05), time
spent playing electronic games increased during social distancing (F
(1,27)
= 36.83, p <
0.001) (Table 2).
Table 2 Means (standard deviations) of hours in specific activities presented by both groups of children at the occasion of
evaluation.
Activity
Group 1
(n=28)
Group 2
(n=40)
Before
During
During
Physical activity (hours/week)
123.3 (88.8)
132.3 (83.5)
121.7 (96.3)
Electronic games (hours/day)
3.44 (2.16)
5.87 (1.82)
5.36 (2.65)
Television (hours/day)
2.80 (1.37)
2.92 (1.19)
3.07 (1.30)
Sleep (hours/night)
8.75 (1.04)
9.07 (1.11)
8.97 (1.40)
BJMB! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Special Issue:
!!!!!! Brazilian!Journal!of!Motor!Behavior! !!!!!!!!!!!!COVID-19 (coronavirus disease): Impacts on motor behavior
!
Leite, Barela, Barela
2021
VOL.15
N.1
30 of 33
Comparison between cohorts during social distancing
ANOVA did not reveal a difference in age (F
(1,66)
= 1.05, p > 0.05) between cohorts,
nor did MANOVA reveal anthropometric differences between cohorts (Wilks’ Lambda =
0.947, F
(3,64)
= 1.20, p > 0.05) (Table 1). ANOVA also did not reveal any effect for physical
activity (F
(1,66)
= 0.22, p > 0.05) and time spent sleeping (F
(1,66)
= 0.09, p > 0.05) in either
cohort. Finally, MANOVA did not reveal any sedentary activity effect in either cohort (Wilks’
Lambda = 0.982, F
(2,65)
= 0.58, p > 0.05) (Table 2).
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study was to investigate physical activity and use of electronics
during COVID-19 social distancing among children from the city of Poá, São Paulo, Brazil.
Our results showed that, in a small cohort of children, time spent engaged in active play
and time spent sleeping were similar before and at the time of the implementation of social
distancing measures. However, results showed an increase in hours spent using electronic
devices. These findings were confirmed in a comparison with the results from the larger
cohort of children.
It is surprising that there was no difference in the time children spent playing
before and during the implementation of COVID-19 social distancing measures. In other
countries, social distancing and lockdown measures have restricted people's mobility,
leading to decreased physical activity and increased sedentariness among adults
4
and
young children,
7,9
but it seems that this is not the case for the Brazilian children who
participated in this study. Several issues could be related to our children’s behavior. First,
Brazilian social distancing measures did not prohibit people from going out and thus never
effectively restricted people's mobility. Although children might differ from adults in terms of
going out behavior, it was still possible for children to move around the area around their
home, playing by themselves and/or with their friends in the neighborhood. Second,
although the city of Poá is in the São Paulo metropolitan area, it is mostly populated by
houses and townhouses, allowing children to use front- and backyard spaces to move
around in and play. In fact, young children in rural Chile who had space to play at home
were less affected by the restrictions than children living in urban areas, who had less
space to play, such as those living in apartments.
7
Despite the fact that there was no difference in the time spent playing before and
during the implementation of the social distancing measures, children might still be less
active during social distancing. A relatively recent study
11
observed that children from the
same city and region spent about three times more time engaged in physical activity when
activities such as commuting to school and other places, and sport practice were
considered. As our results have shown, time spent playing did not differ before and during
the implementation of the social distancing measures, but children from the present study
might not be performing and/or enrolled in the same amount of physical activity as children
in their age group typically did prior to the pandemic. This suggestion needs to be
considered with caution and explored further with additional research.
Another important finding from this study is the dramatic increase in the use of
electronic devices. As has already been observed in adults, people in general are
spending more time sitting in front of screens,
5
and this seems to be the same with the
children in this study. Our results showed an increase in the amount of time that children
BJMB! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Special Issue:
!!!!!! Brazilian!Journal!of!Motor!Behavior! !!!!!!!!!!!!COVID-19 (coronavirus disease): Impacts on motor behavior
!
Leite, Barela, Barela
2021
VOL.15
N.1
31 of 33
spent playing electronic games, although there was no increase in time spent watching
television. Aguilar-Farias and colleagues
7
also observed an increase in time spent in front
of a screen in young children, but they did not specify the activities involved. Thus, it
seems that at the beginning of the adoption of social distancing measures (May 2020), a
fair amount of the time that children would have otherwise spent at school was used to
play games on electronic devices. As observed in adults, who spent more time sitting in
front of computers due to the massive surge in teleworking,
5
our children also increased
the amount of time they spent sitting in front of screens, albeit to play games. It is
important to note that at the time of data collection, many remote classroom activities had
still not been fully implemented; hence, the amount of time children spend using electronic
devices might have increased even more subsequently.
Increased use of electronic devices is also an indicator that children’s
sedentariness might have increased due to the pandemic-induced mobility restrictions.
Surprisingly, no difference in the time spent sleeping was observed for children, unlike
adults, for whom longer sleeping periods have been noted.
4
Aguilar-Farias and colleagues
7
observed that although young children spent more time sleeping, their sleep quality
decreased. Unfortunately, this study did not examine quality of sleep in older children,
which would have provided a means of comparison with these previous data.
This study has several limitations. First, the sample size involved in direct
comparison, i.e., before and during the implementation of COVID-19 restrictions, was small
(n = 28). This was due to the difficulties we experienced contacting and obtaining
cooperation from the children’s family members. However, the second, larger cohort of
children (n = 40) provided similar information, corroborating the results obtained in the
smaller cohort. Second, no direct measure was found regarding physical activity. Again,
the social distancing measures prevented any action regarding the direct measure. Finally,
our results are based on data that were obtained almost one year ago and might not reveal
the actual picture at present. New actions are underway in order to obtain new data, but
execution is challenging due to the dramatic changes that Brazilian society has
experienced, given the high number of COVID-19 infections and the concomitant adoption
of new distancing measures.
CONCLUSION
Brazilian children from Poá remained constant in terms of the total time they spent
engaged in playful activities in the initial stage of the implementation of COVID-19 social
distancing measures; however, indirect measures indicated a reduction in their overall
level of physical activity. An increase in the time spent using electronic devices was
observed, even though remote schooling had not yet been or was just beginning to be
implemented at the time. The pandemic restrictions did not impact total time spent
sleeping.
BJMB! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Special Issue:
!!!!!! Brazilian!Journal!of!Motor!Behavior! !!!!!!!!!!!!COVID-19 (coronavirus disease): Impacts on motor behavior
!
Leite, Barela, Barela
2021
VOL.15
N.1
32 of 33
REFERENCES
1. Garnier-Crussard A, Forestier E, Gilbert T, Krolak-Salmon P. Novel coronavirus (COVID-
19) epidemic: what are the risks for older patients? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68:939-940.
10.1111/jgs.16407.
2. Who. Coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard, https://covid19.who.int (2021, accessed March
18t, 2021 2021).
3. Hall G, Laddu DR, Phillips SA, Lavie CJ, Arena R. A tale of two pandemics: How will
COVID-19 and global trends in physical inactivity and sedentary behavior affect one
another? Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;64:108-110. 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.005.
4. Janssen X, Fleming L, Kirk A, Rollins L, Young D, Grealy M, et al. Changes in physical
activity, sitting and sleep across the COVID-19 national lockdown period in Scotland. Int J
Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17. 10.3390/ijerph17249362.
5. Belzunegui-Eraso A, Erro-Garcés A. Teleworking in the conxtext of the COVID-19 crisis.
Suatainability. 2020;12:3362.
6. Li S, Wang Y, Xue J, Zhao N, Zhu T. The impact of COVID-19 epidemic declaration on
psychological consequences: a study on active weibo users. Int J Environ Res Public
Health. 2020;17. 10.3390/ijerph17062032.
7. Aguilar-Farias N, Toledo-Vargas M, Miranda-Marquez S, Cortinez-O'ryan A, Cristi-Montero
C, Rodriguez-Rodriguez F, et al. Sociodemographic predictors of changes in physical
activity, screen time, and sleep among toddlers and preschoolers in Chile during the
COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;18.
10.3390/ijerph18010176.
8. Dellagiulia A, Lionetti F, Fasolo M, Verderame C, Sperati A, Alessandri G. Early impact of
COVID-19 lockdown on children's sleep: a 4-week longitudinal study. J Clin Sleep Med.
2020;16:1639-1640. 10.5664/jcsm.8648.
9. Alonso-Martinez AM, Ramirez-Velez R, Garcia-Alonso Y, Izquierdo M, Garcia-Hermoso A.
Physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep and self-regulation in Spanish preschoolers
during the COVID-19 lockdown. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18.
10.3390/ijerph18020693.
10. Goldfield GS, Harvey A, Grattan K, Adamo KB. Physical activity promotion in the preschool
years: a critical period to intervene. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9:1326-1342.
10.3390/ijerph9041326.
11. Leite MMV, Barela JA. Extra opportunity increases physical activity levels of children.
Russian Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2017;12:41-48.
12. Checon K, Fonseca VM, Faria CP, Carletti L, Molina MCB. The reproducibility of the
Saúdes: Vitória study's physical activity assessment questionnaire for children. Rev Bras
Saude Mater Infant. 2011;11:173-180.
13. Fernandes CDR. Validação do questionário de atividade física em crianças de 9 e 10 anos
de idade. Dissertation, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES, Brasil, 2012.
BJMB! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Special Issue:
!!!!!! Brazilian!Journal!of!Motor!Behavior! !!!!!!!!!!!!COVID-19 (coronavirus disease): Impacts on motor behavior
!
Leite, Barela, Barela
2021
VOL.15
N.1
33 of 33
14. Andrade Neto F, Eto FN, Pereira TS, Carletti L, Molina Mdel C. Active and sedentary
behaviours in children aged 7 to 10 years old: the urban and rural contexts, Brazil. BMC
Public Health. 2014;14:1174. 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1174.
Citation: Leite MMV, Barela AMF, Barela JA. Playful activity remained constant while electronics use increased in
children during social distancing amidst the COVID-19 outbreak: A Poá’s pilot study. BJMB. 2021:15(1):26-33.
Editors: Dr Fabio Augusto Barbieri - São Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, SP, Brazil; Dr José Angelo Barela -
São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, SP, Brazil; Dr Natalia Madalena Rinaldi - Federal University of
Espírito Santo (UFES), Vitória, ES, Brazil.
Copyright:© 2021 Leite, Barela and Barela and BJMB. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International License which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-
profit sectors.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
DOI:!https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v15i1.238