
BJMB! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Special Issue:
!!!!!! Brazilian!Journal!of!Motor!Behavior! !!!!!!!!!!!!COVID-19 (coronavirus disease): Impacts on motor behavior
!
https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v15i1.238
Comparison between cohorts during social distancing
ANOVA did not reveal a difference in age (F
(1,66)
= 1.05, p > 0.05) between cohorts,
nor did MANOVA reveal anthropometric differences between cohorts (Wilks’ Lambda =
0.947, F
(3,64)
= 1.20, p > 0.05) (Table 1). ANOVA also did not reveal any effect for physical
activity (F
(1,66)
= 0.22, p > 0.05) and time spent sleeping (F
(1,66)
= 0.09, p > 0.05) in either
cohort. Finally, MANOVA did not reveal any sedentary activity effect in either cohort (Wilks’
Lambda = 0.982, F
(2,65)
= 0.58, p > 0.05) (Table 2).
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study was to investigate physical activity and use of electronics
during COVID-19 social distancing among children from the city of Poá, São Paulo, Brazil.
Our results showed that, in a small cohort of children, time spent engaged in active play
and time spent sleeping were similar before and at the time of the implementation of social
distancing measures. However, results showed an increase in hours spent using electronic
devices. These findings were confirmed in a comparison with the results from the larger
cohort of children.
It is surprising that there was no difference in the time children spent playing
before and during the implementation of COVID-19 social distancing measures. In other
countries, social distancing and lockdown measures have restricted people's mobility,
leading to decreased physical activity and increased sedentariness among adults
4
and
young children,
7,9
but it seems that this is not the case for the Brazilian children who
participated in this study. Several issues could be related to our children’s behavior. First,
Brazilian social distancing measures did not prohibit people from going out and thus never
effectively restricted people's mobility. Although children might differ from adults in terms of
going out behavior, it was still possible for children to move around the area around their
home, playing by themselves and/or with their friends in the neighborhood. Second,
although the city of Poá is in the São Paulo metropolitan area, it is mostly populated by
houses and townhouses, allowing children to use front- and backyard spaces to move
around in and play. In fact, young children in rural Chile who had space to play at home
were less affected by the restrictions than children living in urban areas, who had less
space to play, such as those living in apartments.
7
Despite the fact that there was no difference in the time spent playing before and
during the implementation of the social distancing measures, children might still be less
active during social distancing. A relatively recent study
11
observed that children from the
same city and region spent about three times more time engaged in physical activity when
activities such as commuting to school and other places, and sport practice were
considered. As our results have shown, time spent playing did not differ before and during
the implementation of the social distancing measures, but children from the present study
might not be performing and/or enrolled in the same amount of physical activity as children
in their age group typically did prior to the pandemic. This suggestion needs to be
considered with caution and explored further with additional research.
Another important finding from this study is the dramatic increase in the use of
electronic devices. As has already been observed in adults, people in general are
spending more time sitting in front of screens,
5
and this seems to be the same with the
children in this study. Our results showed an increase in the amount of time that children