BJMB! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Brazilian(Journal(of(Motor(Behavior(
(
https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v17i4.360
Special issue:
“Control of Gait and Posture: a tribute to Professor Lilian T. B. Gobbi”
the impairments in some gait parameters and postural control are persistent
6
. Also, continuous use of the medication can bring several
side effects and diminish their effects over time. Thus, physical exercise has been increasingly explored in PD as a complementary
intervention to pharmacotherapy
7,8
. Physical exercise improves neurophysiological aspects (e.g., dopamine concentration and release)
9
,
improve motor symptoms in PwPD, and reduced the risk of falls
10
. The exercises focused on balance and locomotion in PwPD have
improved balance and gait function and reduced falls in PwPD
11,12
.
Studies investigating the characteristics and the effects of different interventions considering the PD subtypes are relevant to
advance the knowledge and propose optimized interventions for each condition in this population. A previous study highlighted the need
for personalized medicine in PD considering its subtypes (e.g., development of genotype-specific therapies) due to the development and
characteristics of each clinical subtype
13
. Although a short-term multidisciplinary exercise program (i.e., two weeks) improved motor
symptoms severity, balance, and functional mobility in both PD subtypes, the benefits in motor symptoms were superior in PIGD subtype
14
. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of information regarding the effects of a long-term exercise intervention in PIGD
and TD subtypes
15
.
Thus, this pilot study aimed to compare the effects of 48 sessions of locomotion and balance exercise on functional mobility in
PwPD considering the PIGD and TD subtypes. We expected that both PD subtypes would improve functional mobility after the exercise
program. We also expected that this improvement would be greater in the PIGD subtype due to the exercise specificity of the proposed
intervention considering the exacerbated deficits that could impact balance and gait performance in this subtype
14
.
METHODS
Participants
Eighteen PwPD participated in this pilot study and were distributed into two groups according to the PD subtype (eight PIGD
and ten TD). The participants were selected through a database from the Program of Physical Activity for People with Parkinson's
disease (PROPARKI). For inclusion criteria, PwPD should be diagnosed based on UK Brain Bank criteria, age > 50 years, took PD
medication, should present a score between one and three in the adapted Hoehn & Yahr scale (H&Y), and independent locomotion.
Exclusion criteria were: i) cognitive decline (score<24 in Mini-Mental State Examination – MMSE)
16
; ii) musculoskeletal, vestibular, or
visual impairments that made it impossible to participate in experimental procedures; and (iii) failing to attend at least 70% of the
sessions. Study approval was obtained from the research ethics committee at São Paulo State University (Unesp) (n. 1058). All
participants gave their signed informed consent before their participation.
Experimental procedures
The experimental protocol was conducted over four months. All experimental procedures (i.e., assessments of clinical
characteristics, cognition, lower limb functional strength, and functional mobility and the physical exercise sessions) were performed at
Unesp Rio Claro. Clinical and cognitive characteristics, lower limb functional strength, and functional mobility were collected before and
after 16 weeks of the physical exercise program.
Clinical, cognitive, and functional mobility assessment
For clinical, cognitive, and functional mobility characteristics, participants attended the Posture and Gait Studies Laboratory
(LEPLO) at the same University in two different times (before and after physical exercises). A specialist researcher applied the Unified
Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the H&Y scale adapted version to evaluate the severity of the symptoms and the stage
of PD, respectively. Also, the UPDRS was used to classify the individuals according to the PD subtype
4
. For that, we calculated the ratio
of the mean UPDRS tremor scores (i.e., eight items) to the mean UPDRS PIGD scores (i.e., five items). The PIGD group included
individuals with ratios ≤1, while the TD group included individuals with ratios ≥1.5
4
. individuals with ratios between 1 and 1.5 were
classified as indeterminate and were excluded from the study. MMSE was performed to assess global cognition.
Functional mobility was evaluated by the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). The TUG involves standing up from a chair, walking
three meters, turning around, walking back to the chair, and sitting down as quickly and safely as possible without running. Participants
performed three trials of the TUG under two conditions: single-task (ST) and dual-task (DT). In DT, participants completed the task
described above while counting backward by 3’s from the pre-selected number (i.e., 30, 42, and 51). The time to perform the test was
measured using a stopwatch and the average of the three trials was considered as the functional mobility performance for each condition.
Lower limb functional strength was assessed by the 30-second sit-to-stand test. Participants were instructed to stand up
(completely) and sit down from a chair as quickly as possible for 30 seconds. The number of repetitions was registered and considered
as the performance of lower limb functional strength.