BJMB! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Brazilian(Journal(of(Motor(Behavior(
(
https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v17i6.418
Special issue:
“In memory of Michael Turvey”
Information Processing approach as well as his groundbreaking research on perception and action from a Dynamical Systems approach.
In the sequence, Rosenbaum provides us with examples of his research program that were influenced by Michael Turvey’s work. First,
he describes how his skepticism of Dynamical Systems influenced his work on a linear delay-line model to explain results that have been
addressed through a coupled oscillator model of timing stability. Second, he describes his studies about how the sudden disappearance
of structured visual input from below affects gaze exploratory behavior. Third, Rosenbaum describes two phenomena studied in his lab
over the years, namely: the end-state comfort effect and grasp-height effect. In the last part of his article, Rosenbaum tells us about
Michael Turvey's generosity.
Whitall and Clark discuss Michael Turvey’s conceptual influence on motor development studies. They organized their article
into two historical parts, providing us with examples and data to support their position. They argue that Michael Turvey had his greatest
influence on motor development studies in the first part [1975-1999], promoting with his colleagues both the Ecological Realism and the
Dynamical Systems approach. In turn, Whitall and Clark argue that the conceptual influence of Michael Turvey is reduced in the second
part [2000-2024]. Of importance, Whitall and Clark's analysis considers not only Michael Turvey’s direct influence on the motor
development field but also his indirect influence through the work of colleagues and students.
The second part of this Special Issue starts with Balasubramanian article, which focuses on Michael Turvey’s contributions to
the advancement of the Dynamical System Approach to motor behavior. Balasubramanian exemplifies Michael Turvey's influence on his
research program. First, he shows that it is possible to have steady, synchronized movements without a central pacemaker. Second,
Balasubramanian shows that music perception involves the motor system, along with the notion of perceptual systems. Third, he
demonstrates that auditory or tactile noise can stabilize posture through stochastic resonance. Fourth, he demonstrates symmetry in
bimanual coordination by manipulating viscous and elastic force fields. His results go along with Michael Turvey’s demonstrations that
anti-phase coordination has larger variability than in-phase. He ends by describing how unstable objects are controlled by assembling
synergies to stabilize the interaction between the object and the human controller.
Amazeen highlights how Michael Turvey influenced her in multidisciplinary thinking and her understanding of a systems
perspective. She advocates for a systems perspective in science, in which everything is connected. She provides examples to
demonstrate the organism-environment inseparability as well as the relevance of history and context for the emergence of observed
behavior. Furthermore, Amazeen also talks about a systems perspective in life by describing how Claudia Carello and Michael Turvey
mentored her at different levels of her life, namely: academically, financially, and socially. That is, to Claudia Carello and Michael Turvey
mentoring goes beyond academia, it requires caring about a student in her entirety. In the last part, Amazeen recognizes the influence of
Michael Turvey in her teaching style, but she considers it essential she has found her own voice and style.
Silva tells us about her relationship with Michael Turvey through the Action Course. The Action Course is one of the core
courses that Ph.D. students must take at CESPA. She describes her interaction with Michael Turvey through lessons she learned.
Lesson 1 is that Michael Turvey helped her to have a strong foundation to conceptualize motor behavior research. She describes how
she had to delve into many difficult readings to understand the fundamental problems of motor behavior and how her experience in the
Action Course continues fostering her scientific thinking. Lesson 2 refers to the need for intellectual humility in scientific inquiry. More
specifically, Michael Turvey was well-known for defending a natural approach to biological movements. However, during the Action
Course, he taught the Artificial (Computational) approaches as if he were a supporter of those approaches, recognizing the effort and
commitment of those with whom he strongly disagreed. Lesson 3 refers to embracing the discomfort inherent in the learning process. As
Silva described it, a necessary comprehension to learn to trust in ourselves as scientists. Lesson 4 refers to being prepared and open to
engaging in challenging scientific exchanges. During the Action Course, students had to work on their arguments based on their readings
while Michael Turvey pushed them to their limits for better comprehension of the theories. Lesson 5 refers to the balance between
academic work and life well-being. Silva also thanks Claudia Carello and Michael Turvey for the opportunity they offered to students on
Friday evenings to gather at the Sweet Williams Pub, situated in their basement.
In the last article, Wagman focused on Michael Turvey’s attitude and principles towards science and life. He started with
Faraday's admonition: “Work. Finish. Publish.” Michael Turvey took Faraday’s admonition seriously, publishing hundreds of papers and
several book chapters. He worked, he finished, and he published. However, Wagman argues that Michael Turvey also considered
teaching as a fundamental dimension of academic life. His famous Teaching Course was proof of how much he valued teaching, at both
undergraduate and graduate levels. Furthermore, Michael Turvey also believed that we should celebrate our accomplishments, no matter
how small they are. Wagman finishes proposing a revision of Faraday’s admonition to make it closer to how Michael Turvey approached
his life and scientific career.
I am thankful to all the Michael Turvey’s colleagues and former students who collaborated with this Special Issue. I would like to
extend my gratitude to Fabio Barbieri, the BJMB Editor-In-Chief, who readily accepted my suggestion of publishing this issue in honor of
Michael Turvey.
Michael Turvey was a brilliant researcher, an outstanding speaker, an astonishing professor, and a dear friend of many. I was
lucky to have the opportunity to study with him. He was always very generous, listening to my ideas and demonstrating curiosity about
the discoveries I was making. Michael Turvey was an example of how to do science and how to foster students’ talents.
Thank you, Michael!